Deborah Brousseau - IMS Expert Services

LawLink rates Deborah Brousseau 5 stars:
Contact Information

Deborah Brousseau

IMS Expert Services

4400 Bayou Blvd.

Pensacola, FL 32503

850.473.2500

Practice Areas
  • Insurance
  • Appraisal - Real Estate
  • Economics
  • Finance
  • Intellectual Property
  • Law Practice
  • About
  • Background
  • Reviews
  • Colleagues
  • Documents

IMS ExpertServices is an expert witness search firm that specializes in connecting highly credentialed, experienced experts and consultants with the attorneys who need them.  By focusing on this niche legal market, we are able to find more qualified experts in less time than it would typically take an attorney.

Professional
 
Undergraduate:
Law School:
Practice Areas: Expert > Insurance
Expert > Intellectual Property
Expert > Appraisal - Real Estate
Expert > Economics
Expert > Finance
Expert > Law Practice
Organizations: IMS ExpertServices
   
Personal
 
Gender:
Status:
Children:
Age:
City of Residence: Pensacola Florida
Home Town:
Home State:
   
Interests
 
My Interests
My Politics:
My Choice For President:
Favorite Justice:
Favorite Books:
Favorite Movies:
Favorite Music:
Favorite Restaurants:
Favorite Travel:
Favorite Quote:
About Me:
   

No Reviews

Must federal courts, before deciding whether to certify a case as a class action, resolve challenges to the plaintiffs' expert witnesses? Surprisingly, given how routinely the issue arises, no federal appellate court had squarely decided the question. District courts have answered the question in various – sometimes conflicting – ways.
Posted by Deborah Brousseau on 6.21.10 in Articles.

Having finally issued its much-anticipated patent ruling in Bilski v. Kappos, the Supreme Court ended its term with a whimper, not a bang – at least as far as patent lawyers are concerned. But even though the opinion left several hot-button issues unresolved, it nonetheless provided a key lesson for lawyers and experts in patent cases: Whatever you do, avoid abstraction.
Posted by Deborah Brousseau on 6.29.10 in Intellectual Prop - Patent Law.

Halfway through, 2010 is already shaping up to be a year of significant rulings involving expert witnesses. In this edition of BullsEye, we look back over the first half of 2010 and highlight the five most important expert rulings handed down this year.
Posted by Deborah Brousseau on 7.28.10 in Expert Witness.

Lawyers are always on the lookout for grounds to challenge their opponents’ expert witnesses. Imagine if those very experts would help you find their Achilles’ heels, sending up red flags that alerted you to their vulnerabilities. Well, maybe they already do. All you need is to know what to look for.
Posted by Deborah Brousseau on 4.26.12 in Expert Witness.

One can hardly check the daily news feed from their favorite syndicators without encountering yet another high profile intellectual property headline. Whether it’s a breaking story about the NFL cracking down on counterfeiters, or the April 18th U.S. Supreme Court ruling regarding a dissatisfied patent applicant’s ability to introduce new evidence, intellectual property related lawsuits dominate headlines.
Posted by Deborah Brousseau on 5.3.12 in Intellectual Prop - Intellectual Prop.

Can a trademark counterfeiting and infringement plaintiff elect statutory damages instead of actual damages under the Lanham Act and still receive attorney’s fees? The 2nd Circuit recently answered that question in the affirmative – to the tune of $3.5 million dollars – leaving some valuable lessons in its wake.
Posted by Deborah Brousseau on 5.15.12 in Litigation.

What’s the value of a word? Amid the barrage of headlines concerning Facebook’s initial public offering, one seemingly harmless four-letter word has been causing a very different kind of legal commotion. The word: Like.
Posted by Deborah Brousseau on 6.13.12 in Intellectual Prop - Intellectual Prop.

by Maggie Tamburro Who would have imagined a pair of high heels, a ceramic tile floor, an Australian safety expert, and an outspoken appellate judge could cross paths, offering lessons about expert testimony along the way? So it seems that life – and law – is full of surprises. In a case where unrelated orbits intersect and learned minds differ, a recent dissenting opinion by one 11th Circuit U.S. Court of Appeals judge reveals how essential common sense is when determining admissibility of expert testimony.
Posted by Deborah Brousseau on 6.21.12 in Expert Witness.